Skip to main content

New in August: Password Manager ratings updated and expanded Read more

Checkup

Business security

KnowBe4 vs Abnormal

KnowBe4 primarily trains people and runs simulations. Abnormal primarily detects and remediates risky email behavior in cloud mailboxes. Most organizations should not treat them as substitutes.

Updated Aug 2026

Start the checklist Email security

Quick answer

Direct answer

KnowBe4 primarily trains people and runs simulations. Abnormal primarily detects and remediates risky email behavior in cloud mailboxes. Most organizations should not treat them as substitutes.

  • Different jobs: human program versus technical mailbox defense
  • Many mature programs eventually need both classes of control
  • SecurityCheckli.st rating: Not assigned for both

KnowBe4 vs Abnormal at a glance

Attribute KnowBe4 Abnormal Security
Primary job Awareness training and simulations Behavioral email threat detection
Primary output Learning campaigns and phishing tests Mailbox detections and remediations
If used alone Technical BEC filtering gaps remain Reporting culture and training gaps remain
SecurityCheckli.st rating Not assigned Not assigned

Cells summarize buyer-relevant differences for diligence. They are not scored ratings. SecurityCheckli.st rating: Not assigned.

KnowBe4 strengths and tradeoffs

KnowBe4

Strengths

  • Scales awareness content
  • Helps evidence training programs
  • Useful for role-based simulations

Limitations and tradeoffs

  • Does not replace filters
  • Punitive rollouts backfire
  • Needs ongoing owner time

Abnormal strengths and tradeoffs

Abnormal Security

Strengths

  • API path for cloud mail
  • Strong BEC-oriented narrative
  • Complements native controls

Limitations and tradeoffs

  • Not an awareness suite
  • Permissions need review
  • Still needs DMARC and MFA

Detailed comparison guidance

How to use this comparison

If leadership asks which one to buy instead of the other, reframe the conversation. Training without technical controls leaves invoice fraud open. Technical controls without reporting culture leave residual social engineering unreported.

Budget sequencing: fix authentication and baseline mailbox security, add API/gateway depth for BEC, and run awareness that rewards reporting.

Note on alternatives

We did not publish a KnowBe4 versus Hoxhunt page in this wave. If your shortlist is two awareness vendors, compare them on content quality and culture fit rather than forcing an Abnormal comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Do you publish a numeric SecurityCheckli.st rating on this page?
No. SecurityCheckli.st rating: Not assigned until evidence supports a published score. We will not invent a number to fill a table.
Are product capabilities independently verified?
Unless an evidence block marks a finding as confirmed, treat detailed capability claims as vendor-reported and validate them in your own tenancy or pilot.
Which should we buy first?
If phishing email is actively succeeding, prioritize technical mailbox controls. If technology is decent but humans never report, prioritize awareness.
Can we buy both?
Yes, and many programs do. Just assign different owners.
Where are reviews?
KnowBe4 and Abnormal Security review pages.
What about Proofpoint?
Proofpoint is another technical email security path, sometimes with awareness adjacency.

Related live research

review

KnowBe4 review

review

Abnormal Security review

guide

Best security awareness training

guide

Best phishing protection

review

Proofpoint review

Sources and further reading

  1. SecurityChecklist enterprise methodology — SecurityCheckli.st
    How ratings, commercial relationships, and limitations are handled
  2. Business security hub — SecurityCheckli.st
  3. Email security — SecurityCheckli.st

Next step

Record must-haves in the checklist, then continue with the parent hub or methodology.

Start the checklist Email security